Every listing shows a real preview and a real example output before you pay. Prompts are written by the people who use them, starting with a small set from us to get the shelves stocked.
8 prompts matching “Proposal” · clear
Builds a funder-ready logic model and theory of change narrative from the program you actually run, with an indicator and a real data source behind every outcome row.
Turns a grant solicitation into a compliance matrix and a scoring crosswalk, so nothing required goes missing and every point the funder offers has a section pointed at it.
Sets the year of grant targets against the hours you actually have: what to pursue, what to drop, when each proposal has to start, and what the plan realistically brings in.
Builds a needs statement that argues from data at three levels (community, population, and your specific service gap) without a single unverifiable statistic slipping through.
Builds the renewal ask from what actually happened during the grant: what was promised, what was delivered, what changed, and what the next request should be, including when the honest number is smaller.
Drafts the sustainability section from what the organization can actually commit to, and writes the credible version when the honest answer is that the program ends without renewal.
Turns a declined proposal and whatever feedback came with it into a specific list of what to fix, what to leave alone, and whether to resubmit to this funder at all.
Builds the supporter list, the request emails, and a distinct draft letter for each partner, so six letters arrive before the deadline saying six different things.