Every listing shows a real preview and a real example output before you pay. Prompts are written by the people who use them, starting with a small set from us to get the shelves stocked.
45 prompts
All seven school counseling prompts in one purchase, plus a routing prompt that tells you which one to reach for and in what order.
All five grant research prompts covering the full cycle, plus a cycle-planning prompt that sequences them against a real submission deadline.
A four-stage chain that turns scattered intervention records into a referral-packet narrative: a cycle-by-cycle inventory, a gap audit written the way a reviewer reads, the chronological narrative, and the questions the team should expect.
A three-step sequence that reads an award agreement and turns it into a dated obligation calendar, an owner for every item, and the collection habits that make the final report writable a year later.
A four-step sequence that turns a year of counseling activity, use of time, and program data into a results report an administrator will read and a program review will accept.
Builds a complete Tier 2 SEL small-group arc: session plans, ASCA-aligned objectives, progress monitoring, and the results report that justifies the group.
A four-stage chain for the meeting where a school team reviews intervention data: a flagged pre-read built from raw numbers, a time-boxed agenda, a decision record with owners and dates, and the collection plan for the next cycle.
Builds a funder final report in four stages that reports honestly against the objectives you actually promised, including the ones you missed, without losing the renewal.
A three-step sequence for a junior or senior family night: what to cover based on your own data, a run of show with handouts at a readable level, and the follow-up that reaches the families who did not come.
A four-stage coaching sequence that gets a student to a stronger personal statement in their own voice by asking questions and giving feedback. It never writes their prose.
Drafts a one- to two-page letter of inquiry that fits a specific funder's stated interests and survives the thirty-second skim that decides whether you get invited to apply.
Assembles completed FBA data into a draft behavior intervention plan: hypothesized function, a replacement behavior that beats the target behavior on effort, strategies that trace to the function, and a monitoring and fidelity plan.
Writes tier entry, response, and exit criteria for a building: each one names its data source, threshold, points required, and who applies it, sized to the seats that actually exist, with a check on who the thresholds would have flagged last year.
Builds a funder-ready logic model and theory of change narrative from the program you actually run, with an indicator and a real data source behind every outcome row.
Turns a grant solicitation into a compliance matrix and a scoring crosswalk, so nothing required goes missing and every point the funder offers has a section pointed at it.
Writes the budget narrative that justifies every line in your budget, handles indirect cost rate and cost share correctly, and flags the lines a reviewer will question.
Organizes what you already did during a crisis response into clean, defensible documentation. It performs no risk assessment and makes no clinical judgment.
Sets the year of grant targets against the hours you actually have: what to pursue, what to drop, when each proposal has to start, and what the plan realistically brings in.
Turns a student's data into a defensible Tier 2 intervention match: the concern in observable terms, the recommendation with reasoning, the options ruled out, entry criteria, and a monitoring cadence with decision rules.
Produces a prioritized funder prospect brief for your mission and service area, with an approach strategy for each tier and every unverifiable figure marked for checking.
Builds a needs statement that argues from data at three levels (community, population, and your specific service gap) without a single unverifiable statistic slipping through.
Turns a match or cost share requirement into a line-by-line plan: what counts, who commits it, how each item gets documented, and where the shortfall is before the deadline rather than after the award.
Builds the measurement half of an intervention cycle: observable target, confirmed baseline, a goal with its implied weekly rate, the measure and who collects it, decision rules for continue, intensify, change, and exit, plus a fidelity check.
Builds an attendance intervention from the actual pattern: what the data shows by day and period, ranked barriers with a confidence level, one matched action per barrier with an owner, a family contact plan, and supports ahead of consequences.
Builds the renewal ask from what actually happened during the grant: what was promised, what was delivered, what changed, and what the next request should be, including when the honest number is smaller.
Drafts the sustainability section from what the organization can actually commit to, and writes the credible version when the honest answer is that the program ends without renewal.
Turns a scattered referral list into a resource map you can verify and keep current, plus the packet a family can actually use: who to call, what to say, and what to do when the first call goes nowhere.
Prepares one funder conversation: the sixty-second opening, three questions worth the officer's time, the answers to have ready, what to leave alone, and the follow-up note drafted before the call.
Designs a check-in check-out cycle end to end: the function fit test, a point card tied to your schoolwide expectations, the daily scripts, the fidelity checklist, and the fading plan that gets the student off it.
Turns your raw IEP or 504 meeting notes into a plain-language family summary that mirrors the team's actual decisions without inventing any.
Builds one classroom counseling lesson for a named grade and time slot, tied to the standards you cite, with a matched pre and post instrument that produces data you can actually report.
Builds a sponsorship offer a local business can say yes to: tiers priced against what you can actually deliver, the ask email, the follow-up, and a fulfillment list so the promise gets kept.
Turns a declined proposal and whatever feedback came with it into a specific list of what to fix, what to leave alone, and whether to resubmit to this funder at all.
Checks a transcript against your school's own graduation requirements and returns a requirement-by-requirement status, the credit gaps, recovery options by term, and a plain-language note home.
Prepares one course selection conference: what to check in the record first, the questions that surface constraints a student will not volunteer, and a four-year plan with every prerequisite chain traced.
Turns a brag sheet plus what you actually know about a student into a traceable draft letter, with an evidence map first and every unsupported claim flagged instead of invented.
Turns a partial record from a sending school into a first-week plan: what to request and from whom, who to notify, what to schedule, and the questions that cannot wait a week.
Builds a facilitator guide for a restorative or peer-mediation conversation, including the pre-meetings, the actual script, and the conditions under which you should not hold it.
Puts two or more award letters into the same shape: gift aid versus loans, the real cost for one year at each school, what renews, and the questions to ask each financial aid office.
Writes a short family update about an intervention: what it is, what the data shows, what happens next, and what the family can ask for, plus a sender-only block on what was left out and which lines will draw questions.
Builds the supporter list, the request emails, and a distinct draft letter for each partner, so six letters arrive before the deadline saying six different things.
Turns a student profile into a prioritized scholarship search brief with realistic effort-to-award ratios and a deadline-ordered action plan.
Rewrites the reply you want to send into one you can actually send: warm, factual, boundaried, and free of the phrases that escalate a parent complaint.
Turns your scribbled between-bells check-in notes into a clean, de-identified contact log with MTSS tier tagging and an ASCA use-of-time summary.
Screens a funding opportunity against your organization in about ten minutes and returns a defensible go, no-go, or go-if decision with the reasoning written down.